Your store is invisible to AI search.
Here's the proof.
Shoppers now ask ChatGPT, Perplexity and Google's AI Overview for the best products. Those answers cite a handful of sources. If yours isn't one of them, you're not in the running — and your analytics will never tell you.
Share of AI-answer citations earned by a real US pet-supplements store we measured. The category leader took 63.2%. A directly comparable brand its own size earned 34× more citations. Every number on this page is measured, not estimated.
How it works
- We measure. We pull your real share of AI-answer citations against four named competitors, and audit your store's schema, canonicals and
llms.txt. - You get the proof. A one-page audit showing exactly which brands get cited instead of you, and the specific reasons why.
- We fix it. Entity pages, FAQ and comparison content, JSON-LD and pSEO templates — the structures AI answers actually pull from.
Pricing
Audit
Delivered in 24 hours
- Citation-share vs 4 competitors
- Schema & canonical audit
- Prioritised fix list
AI Visibility Fix
5 pages · 5 days
- Everything in Audit
- 5 pages built & shipped
- Entity + FAQ + comparison
- Re-measured on delivery
Full Overhaul
Site-wide · 14 days
- Everything in Fix
- Site-wide schema rebuild
- pSEO template repair
- 30-day re-measurement
What the proof looks like
Three real Google AI Overviews we captured while auditing stores in these categories. Brand and publisher names are redacted. In every one, the AI answer recommends a short list — and the stores we were auditing are not on it.
